Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target
Date
Msg-id 20190801103010.hzy6kw53qm2bkr5a@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target
Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 05:25:31PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:16 PM Jamison, Kirk <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > On Saturday, July 27, 2019 7:06 AM(GMT+9), Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 07:03:41AM +0000, Jamison, Kirk wrote:
>> > > >Overall, the patch is almost already in good shape for commit.
>> > > >I'll wait for the next update.
>
>> > The patch passed the make-world and regression tests as well.
>> > I've marked this as "ready for committer".
>>
>> The patch does not apply anymore.
>
>Based on the above, it sounds like this patch is super close and the
>only problem is bitrot, so I've set it back to Ready for Committer.
>Over to Tomas to rebase and commit, or move to the next CF if that's
>more appropriate.
>

I'll move it to the next CF. Aside from the issues pointed by Kyotaro-san
in his review, I still haven't made my mind about whether to base the use
statistics targets set for the attributes. That's what we're doing now,
but I'm not sure it's a good idea after adding separate statistics target.
I wonder what Dean's opinion on this is, as he added the current logic.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for jsonpath .datetime() method
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join