Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance
Date
Msg-id 20190717185254.3ckjpiujkctm4b4i@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi

On 2019-07-17 13:55:51 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Be careful with pg_buffercache though, as it can cause a hiccup in
> operation.

I think that's been fixed a few years back:

commit 6e654546fb61f62cc982d0c8f62241b3b30e7ef8
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi>
Date:   2016-09-29 13:16:30 +0300

    Don't bother to lock bufmgr partitions in pg_buffercache.

    That makes the view a lot less disruptive to use on a production system.
    Without the locks, you don't get a consistent snapshot across all buffers,
    but that's OK. It wasn't a very useful guarantee in practice.

    Ivan Kartyshov, reviewed by Tomas Vondra and Robert Haas.

    Discusssion: <f9d6cab2-73a7-7a84-55a8-07dcb8516ae5@postgrespro.ru>

so everything from 10 onwards ought to be fine.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance
Next
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: Searching in varchar column having 100M records