Hi David,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:40:59PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 19:35, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> This has been reverted as of f5db56f, still it seems to me that this
>> was moving in the right direction.
>
> I've pushed this again, this time with the cleanup code done in the
> right order.
I have spent some time lately analyzing f7c830f as I was curious about
the logic behind it, and FWIW the result looks good. Thanks!
--
Michael
