Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)« - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)«
Date
Msg-id 20190706131118.GA9497@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)«  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-bugs
Re: Peter Geoghegan 2019-07-06 <CAH2-WznYXDG6aANoag5ixoMrV=0bD-W5i9cVq4cRkb-fA4xRmw@mail.gmail.com>
> > When pg_upgrading from 10-or-earlier to 12beta2 or 13devel, an assertion is
> > raised. (Spotted by Debian's postgresql-common upgrade tests. Previously
> > missed because we were only testing version+1 upgrades.)
> 
> Obviously you were right to adopt pg_upgrade tests that cross more
> than one version at a time. Thanks!

Indeed, and running 9.6->10->11 tests (that were present before as
well, but never run) revealed another bug in pg_upgradecluster
itself... Testsuites are just awesome.

Christoph



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15898: pg_dump error not able to restore complete dump
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ODBC: SQLGetDescField returns incorrect length forSQL_DESC_COUNT field of APD