Re: Too short field - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Karsten Hilbert
Subject Re: Too short field
Date
Msg-id 20190703121055.GC2383@hermes.hilbert.loc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Too short field  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Too short field  (Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:56:03PM +0200, Thomas Kellerer wrote:

> Karl Martin Skoldebrand schrieb am 03.07.2019 um 13:30:
> > Now, we have a bug in another application that prevents an automatic
> > tool to enter certain users in the database. The organisational field
> > is varchar(60) while the actual Organisation “abbreviation” may be as
> > long as 70 characters (don’t ask why).
> >
> > What happens to data if I simple redefine the table field as
> > varchar(80) (or something, at least 70+). Does “everything” break
> > database side or can I just go on running the app as is.
>
> Nothing will break on the database size.

We don't know. There may be functions in triggers or for
direct use which rely on the assumption that it be 60 chars
max.

PostgreSQL itself won't care, that much holds.

Karsten
--
GPG  40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6  5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Karl Martin Skoldebrand
Date:
Subject: RE: Too short field
Next
From: Karsten Hilbert
Date:
Subject: Re: Too short field