Re: C testing for Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: C testing for Postgres
Date
Msg-id 20190628215444.GD20338@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C testing for Postgres  (Adam Berlin <aberlin@pivotal.io>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 09:42:54AM -0400, Adam Berlin wrote:
> Here are my takeaways from the previous discussions:
> 
> * there *is* interest in testing

Yep.

> * we shouldn't take it too far
> * there are already tests being written under `src/test/modules`, but
> without a consistent way of describing expectations and displaying results

This is a giant problem.

> * no tool was chosen

If there's a way to get this in the tree, assuming people agree it
should be there, that'd be fantastic.

Our current system has been creaking for years.

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest 2019-07, the first of five* for PostgreSQL 13
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible