Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock
Date
Msg-id 20190617022555.GA20544@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Jun-17, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 09:10:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yeah, let's do that.  I don't want to risk shipping broken code.
> > We can try again for the next updates.
> 
> Could you revert asap please then?

Done.

I initially thought to keep the test in place, but then realized it
might be unstable, so I removed that too.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: nbtdesc.c and nbtpage.c are inconsistent with XLOG_BTREE_META_CLEANUP(11~)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock