On 2019-Jun-13, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Jun-13, Oleksii Kliukin wrote:
>
> > Makes sense. For the symmetry I have included those that perform lock
> > upgrades in one session and those that doesn’t, while the other sessions
> > acquire locks, do updates or deletes. For those that don’t upgrade locks the
> > test checks that the locks are acquired in the correct order.
>
> Thanks for the updated patch! I'm about to push to branches 9.6-master.
> It applies semi-cleanly (only pgindent-maturity whitespace conflicts).
Done, thanks for the report and patch!
I tried hard to find a scenario that this patch breaks, but couldn't
find anything.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
