On 2019-Jun-11, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 08:55:27AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > -1 on this approach. Having this ownercheck function return the owning
> > object ID seems way too strange. I'd rather not have the new ownercheck
> > function, and instead do a syscache search to obtain the type OID in
> > check_object_ownership, then do pg_type_ownercheck. I'm not even sure
> > that pg_domain_constraint_ownercheck makes a lot of sense in itself,
> > since it's never the constraint that requires an owner check.
>
> I can see your point, yes perhaps I overdid it. What do you think
> about the attached instead? This moves the syscache lookup directly
> into check_object_ownership() as you suggest.
Yeah, looks better. I think the error message should be a normal elog()
cache failure, though ... at least in the COMMENT case, the obj-does-not-
exist message is supposed to be thrown by get_object_address(), before
check_object_ownership is called.
As a matter of style, I would get rid of the 'conoid' variable and just
use address.objectId where needed.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
