On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 03:54:30PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Following this direction, the attached PoC works *at least for*
> the wal_optimization TAP tests, but doing pending flush not in
> smgr but in relcache.
This task, syncing files created in the current transaction, is not the kind
of task normally assigned to a cache. We already have a module, storage.c,
that maintains state about files created in the current transaction. Why did
you use relcache instead of storage.c?
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 09:29:48PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> This is a tidier version of the patch.
> - Move the substantial work to table/index AMs.
>
> Each AM can decide whether to support WAL skip or not.
> Currently heap and nbtree support it.
Why would an AM find it important to disable WAL skip?
