Re: pgindent run next week? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: pgindent run next week?
Date
Msg-id 20190517181130.h3nycw5h3pi2fl3c@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgindent run next week?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pgindent run next week?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2019-05-17 13:47:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
 > > Would we want to also apply this to the back branches to avoid spurious
> > conflicts?
> 
> I dunno, how far back are you thinking?  I've occasionally wished we
> could reindent all the back branches to match HEAD, but realistically,
> people carrying out-of-tree patches would scream.

I somehow thought we'd backpatched pgindent changes before, around when
moving to the newer version of indent. But I think we might just have
discussed that, and then didn't go for it...

Not sure if a three-way merge wouldn't take care of many, but not all,
the out-of-tree patch concerns.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Is it safe to ignore the return value of SPI_finish and SPI_execute?
Next
From: Ashwin Agrawal
Date:
Subject: Create TOAST table only if AM needs