Re: PG12, PGXS and linking pgfeutils - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: PG12, PGXS and linking pgfeutils
Date
Msg-id 20190509173911.GA16616@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG12, PGXS and linking pgfeutils  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PG12, PGXS and linking pgfeutils  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-May-09, Tom Lane wrote:

> I'm not especially on board with the idea of moving FE-specific error
> handling code into libpgcommon, as that breaks the concept that
> src/common/ is broadly for code that can work in either frontend or
> backend contexts.  However, we already have a few violations of that
> rule: common/Makefile already has
> 
> # A few files are currently only built for frontend, not server
> OBJS_FRONTEND = $(OBJS_COMMON) fe_memutils.o file_utils.o restricted_token.o
> 
> So maybe the answer is to move these logging support functions into
> src/common, in a file that's only built for frontend.

I wonder if a better solution isn't to move the file_utils stuff to
fe_utils.  Half of it is frontend-specific.  The only one that should be
shared to backend seems to be fsync_fname ... but instead of sharing it,
we have a second copy in fd.c.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG12, PGXS and linking pgfeutils
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and KeyManagement Service (KMS)