Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date
Msg-id 20190509041154.GC14573@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 11:28:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
>> No problem to do that.  I'll brush up all that once you commit the
>> first piece you have come up with, and reuse the new API of catalog.c
>> you are introducing based on the table OID.
>
> Pushed my stuff, have at it.

Thanks.  Attached is what I get to after scanning the error messages
in indexcmds.c and index.c.  Perhaps you have more comments about it?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Next
From: "craig.ringer"
Date:
Subject: Re: Implicit timezone conversion replicating from timestamp totimestamptz?