Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date
Msg-id 20190411035952.GL2728@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 03:50:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> And here is the patch to address this issue.  It happens that a bit
> more than the dependency switch was lacking here:
> - At swap time, we need to have the new index definition track
> relispartition from the old index.
> - Again at swap time, the inheritance link needs to be updated between
> the old/new index and its parent when reindexing a partition index.

Peter, this is an open item, and I think as the committer of the
feature you are its owner.  Well, in this case, I don't mind taking
the ownership as need be as I know this stuff.  Anyway, could you have
a look at the patch proposed and see if you have any issues with it?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Qestion about .partial WAL file
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage