Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists
Date
Msg-id 20190409022918.GD1875@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 09:13:01PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Hmmm, what's the right status in the CF app when a part of a patch was
> committed and the rest should be moved to the next CF? Committed, Moved
> to next CF, or something else?

This stuff has been around for nine commit fests, and you have been
able to finish the basic work.  So I think that committed is most
appropriate so as you can start later on with a new concept, new patch
sets, perhaps a new thread, and surely a new CF entry.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashwin Agrawal
Date:
Subject: Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20] GSSAPI encryption support