On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:27:55AM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> Not agree. Latest patch version perform walreceiver restart without
> switch to a different method as discussed. Here is no race condition
> between startup process and walreceiver because conninfo passed via
> WalRcvData struct as currently. I miss something important?
> Michael Paquier had no possibility to review latest implementation,
> but did not say this is totally wrong, just asked wait a rather
> close lookup.
I agree with Sergei's statement here. He has sent a patch for review,
which I have looked up a bit, but not enough to provide a full review
unfortunately, and this even if I was listed as a reviewer of it. So
if somebody is to blame here, that's me.
> Of cource we can close this cf entry. I would be happy if someone
> else post proper implementation. And I can rework my implementation
> again, but I don’t know how the correct implementation should look
> or why latest implementation is wrong.
Moving this patch to next CF is fine.
--
Michael
