Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs
Date
Msg-id 20190401185509.bnnqdjg4temuxqom@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs
Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-04-01 20:48:41 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-04-01 20:31, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I'm unhappy about this being committed.  I don't think there was
> > terribly much buyin for this amount of duplicated infrastructure.
> 
> What duplicated infrastructure?

A written upthread, I think this should have had a uniform interface
with elog.h, and probably even share some code between the two. This is
going in the wrong direction, making it harder, not easier, to share
code between frontend and backend. While moving around as much code as
we'd have had to do if we'd gone to error reporting compatible with
elog.h.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: C_C_A animal on HEAD gets stuck in initdb