Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint
Date
Msg-id 20190329.162528.426261429442510794.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses RE: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint
List pgsql-hackers
> Personally, I don't find this hint particularly necessary.  The session
> was terminated because nothing was happening, so the real fix on the
> application side is probably more involved than just retrying.  This is
> different from some of the other cases that were cited, such as
> serialization conflicts, where you just got unlucky due to concurrent
> events.  In the case of idle-in-transaction-timeout, the fault is
> entirely your own.

Hum. Sounds like a fair argument. Ideriha-san, what do you think?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Imai, Yoshikazu"
Date:
Subject: RE: speeding up planning with partitions
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0