Re: software or hardware RAID? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Kenneth Marshall
Subject Re: software or hardware RAID?
Date
Msg-id 20190323221241.GI21148@aart.rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: software or hardware RAID?  (Rory Campbell-Lange <rory@campbell-lange.net>)
Responses Re: software or hardware RAID?  (Perumal Raj <perucinci@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 12:09:11PM +0000, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> On 17/03/19, Rory Campbell-Lange (rory@campbell-lange.net) wrote:
> > We aren't sure whether to use software MDRaid or a MegaRAID card.
> > 
> > We're buying some new Postgres servers with 
> > 
> >     2 x 240GB Intel SSD S4610 (RAID1 : system)
> >     4 x 960GB Intel SSD S4610 (RAID10 : db)
> > 
> > We'll be using Postgres 11 on Debian.
> > 
> > The MegaRAID 9271-8i with flash cache protection is available from our
> > provider. I think they may also have the 9361-8i which is 12Gb/s.
> > 
> > Our current servers which use the LSI 9261 with SSDs and we don't see
> > any IO significant load as we are in RAM most of the time and the RAID
> > card seems to flatten out any IO spikes.
> > 
> > We use MDRaid elsewhere but we've never used it for our databases
> > before.
> 
> Apologies for re-heating this email from last week. I could really do with the
> advice.
> 
> Has anyone got any general comments on whether software RAID or an LSI card
> is preferable?
> 
> We will be replicating load on an existing server, which has an LSI 9261 card.
> Below is some stats from sar showing a "heavy" period of load on vdisk sda
> 
>     00:00:01  DEV     tps  rd_sec/s  wr_sec/s  avgrq-sz  avgqu-sz     await     svctm     %util
>     14:15:01  sda  112.82    643.09  14986.24    138.53      2.09     18.50      0.25      2.86
>     14:25:01  sda  108.52    270.17  15682.94    147.01      1.87     17.22      0.25      2.73
>     14:35:01  sda  107.96    178.25  14868.52    139.37      1.70     15.73      0.23      2.53
>     14:45:01  sda  150.97    748.94  16919.69    117.03      1.83     12.11      0.22      3.28
> 
> Thanks for any advice.
> Rory 

Hi Rory,

The main reason, in my opinion, to use a HW RAID card is for the NVRAM
battery backed cache to support writing to traditional spinning disks.
Since your SSDs have power-loss support, you do not need that and the HW
RAID controller. For database use, you would almost certainly be using
RAID 10 and software RAID 10 is extremely performant. I am in the middle
of setting up a new system with NVMe SSD drives and HW RAID would be a
terrible bottle-neck and software RAID is really the only realistice
option.

Regards,
Ken


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rory Campbell-Lange
Date:
Subject: Re: software or hardware RAID?
Next
From: Steve Baldwin
Date:
Subject: regr_slope returning NULL