Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs
Date
Msg-id 20190318204235.GA30360@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
Responses Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Jesper

On 2019-Mar-01, Jesper Pedersen wrote:

> I'm getting a failure in the pg_upgrade test:
> 
>  --
> +-- Name: pk5 pk5_pkey; Type: CONSTRAINT; Schema: regress_fk; Owner:
> jpedersen
> +--
> +
> +ALTER TABLE ONLY regress_fk.pk5
> +    ADD CONSTRAINT pk5_pkey PRIMARY KEY (a);
> +
> +
> +--
> 
> when running check-world.

So I tested this case just now (after fixing a couple of bugs) and see a
slightly different problem now: those excess lines are actually just
that pg_dump chose to print the constraints in different order, as there
are identical lines with "-" in the diff I get.  The databases actually
*are* identical as far as I can tell.  I haven't yet figured out how to
fix this; of course, the easiest solution is to just drop the regress_fk
schema at the end of the foreign_key.sql regression test, but I would
prefer a different solution.

I'm going to post the new version of the patch separately.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove repetitive characters in fdwhandler.sgml
Next
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums