Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binaryreloptions representation for each relation kind instead - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binaryreloptions representation for each relation kind instead |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20190318.170024.57723028.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp Whole thread Raw |
In response to | RE: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binaryreloptions representation for each relation kind instead ("Iwata, Aya" <iwata.aya@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Responses |
RE: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binaryreloptions representation for each relation kind instead
Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptions representation for each relation kind instead |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hello. At Mon, 18 Mar 2019 03:03:04 +0000, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata.aya@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote in <71E660EB361DF14299875B198D4CE5423DF05777@g01jpexmbkw25> > This patch does not apply. Please refer to http://commitfest.cputube.org/ and update it. > How about separating your patch by feature or units that can be phased commit. > For example, adding assert macro at first, refactoring StdRdOptions by the next, etc. > > So I change status to "Waiting for Author". That seems to be a good oppotunity. I have some comments. rel.h: -#define RelationGetToastTupleTarget(relation, defaulttarg) \ - ((relation)->rd_options ? \ - ((StdRdOptions *) (relation)->rd_options)->toast_tuple_target : (defaulttarg)) +#define RelationGetToastTupleTarget(relation, defaulttarg) \ + (AssertMacro(relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_RELATION || \ + relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_MATVIEW), \ + ((relation)->rd_options ? \ + ((HeapRelOptions *) (relation)->rd_options)->toast_tuple_target : \ + (defaulttarg))) Index AMs parse reloptions by their handler functions. HeapRelOptions in this patch are parsed in relation_reloptions calling heap_reloptions. Maybe at least it should be called as table_options. But I'm not sure what is the desirable shape of relation_reloptions for the moment. hio.c: - saveFreeSpace = RelationGetTargetPageFreeSpace(relation, - HEAP_DEFAULT_FILLFACTOR); + if (IsToastRelation(relation)) + saveFreeSpace = ToastGetTargetPageFreeSpace(); + else + saveFreeSpace = HeapGetTargetPageFreeSpace(relation); This locution appears four times in the patch and that's the all where the two macros appear. And it might not be good that RelationGetBufferForTuple identifies a heap directly since I suppose that currently tost is a part of heap. Thus it'd be better that HeapGetTargetPageFreeSpace handles the toast case. Similary, it doesn't looks good that RelationGetBufferForTuple consults HeapGetTargretPageFreeSpace() directly. Perhaps it should be called via TableGetTargetPageFreeSpace(). I'm not sure what is the right shape of the relationship among a relation and a table and other kinds of relation. extract_autovac_opts penetrates through the modularity boundary of toast/heap in a similar way. plancat.c: + if (relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_RELATION || + relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_MATVIEW) + rel->rel_parallel_workers = RelationGetParallelWorkers(relation, -1); + else + rel->rel_parallel_workers = -1; rel.h: #define RelationGetParallelWorkers(relation, defaultpw) \ (AssertMacro(relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_RELATION || \ relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_MATVIEW), \ ((relation)->rd_options ? \ ((HeapRelOptions *) (relation)->rd_options)->parallel_workers : \ (defaultpw))) These function/macros are doing the same check twice at a call. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
pgsql-hackers by date: