On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:02:43PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> I think we should save such a patch for whenever we next update the
>> archive version number, which could take a couple of years given past
>> history. I'm inclined to add a comment near K_VERS_SELF to remind
>> whoever next patches it.
>
> +1. This isn't an unreasonable cleanup idea, but being only a cleanup
> idea, it doesn't seem worth creating compatibility issues for. Let's
> wait till there is some more-pressing reason to change the archive format,
> and then fix this in the same release cycle.
+1. Having a comment as reminder would be really nice.
--
Michael
