Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Date
Msg-id 20190222232915.GA8725@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 09:45:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> +1 ... maybe "(dropped)", because we tend to use parens for this sort
> of thing, I think.

+1.  Using "dropped" sounds good to me in this context.  Perhaps we
could have something more fancy like what's used for dropped columns?
It would be nice to get a reference to a schema, like say "dropped
temporary schema".
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Journal based VACUUM FULL
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepared transaction releasing locks before deregistering its GID