Re: Reaping Temp tables to avoid XID wraparound - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 2. Or probably even better, just put it in PgBackendStatus? Overhead here
> is a lot cheaper than PGPROC.
>
> ISTM 2 is probably the most reasonable option here?

Yes, I forgot this one.  That would be more consistent, even if the
information can be out of date quickly we don't care here.
--
Michael