Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums
Date
Msg-id 20190219050224.GV15532@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums  (Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>)
Responses Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums  (Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 07:31:38PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> New patch attached.

- * src/bin/pg_verify_checksums/pg_verify_checksums.c
+ * src/bin/pg_checksums/pg_checksums.c
That's lacking a rename, or this comment is incorrect.

+#if PG_VERSION_NUM >= 100000
+   StaticAssertStmt(sizeof(ControlFileData) <= PG_CONTROL_MAX_SAFE_SIZE,
+                    "pg_control is too large for atomic disk writes");
+#endif
This is compiled with only one version of the control file data, so
you don't need that.

Any reason why we don't refactor updateControlFile() into
controldata_utils.c?  This duplicates the code, at the exception of
some details.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepared transaction releasing locks before deregistering its GID
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [Bug Fix] ECPG: could not use set xxx to default statement