Hi,
On 2018-10-26 09:21:51 +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> (1) you are somehow against changing the current implementation, eg erroring
> out on possibly misleading configurations, because you do not think it is
> really useful to help users in those cases.
I find this formulation somewhat passive aggressive.
> (2) you are not against improving the documentation, although you find it
> clear enough already, but you agree that some people could get confused.
>
> The attached patch v4 only improves the documentation so that it reflects
> what the implementation really does. I think it too bad to leave out the
> user-friendly aspects of the patch, though.
Robert, any chance you could opine on the doc patch, given that's your
suggested direction?
- Andres
