Re: Don't deform column-by-column in composite_to_json - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Don't deform column-by-column in composite_to_json
Date
Msg-id 20190206015337.GA3854@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Don't deform column-by-column in composite_to_json  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Don't deform column-by-column in composite_to_json
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Feb-01, Andres Freund wrote:

> diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/json.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/json.c
> index de0d0723b71..8724022df54 100644
> --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/json.c
> +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/json.c
> @@ -1755,6 +1755,8 @@ composite_to_json(Datum composite, StringInfo result, bool use_line_feeds)
>      int            i;
>      bool        needsep = false;
>      const char *sep;
> +    Datum        values[MaxHeapAttributeNumber];
> +    bool        nulls[MaxHeapAttributeNumber];
>  
>      sep = use_line_feeds ? ",\n " : ",";

Isn't this putting much more than needed in the stack?  Seems like we
could just allocate tupdesc->natts members dynamically.  Not sure if we
care: it's about 12 kB; maybe considering palloc overhead, using the
stack is better.

Worth asking.  But if this is worth doing here, then it's worth doing in
a lot more places, isn't it?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: bug tracking system