On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:22:48AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> If we have well-designed answers to these questions, I'd imagine that
> the actual feature patch would be quite small. I was very surprised to
> see how large this patch is and how much code is moves around without
> much explanation. I don't think it's worth reviewing this patch any
> further. It needs several steps back and some fundamental design and
> refactoring work.
Marked as returned with feedback. This thread has stalled.
--
Michael
