Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current
Date
Msg-id 20190204054344.GR29064@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 10:58:02PM +1100, Thomas Munro wrote:
> If there are no objections, I'm planning to do a round of testing and
> commit this shortly.

Hm.  That looks sane to me at quick glance.  I am a bit on the edge
regaring the naming "FullTransactionId", which is actually a 64-bit
value with a 32-bit XID and a 32-bit epoch.  Something like
TransactionIdWithEpoch or EpochTransactionId sounds a bit better to
me.  My point is that "Full" is too generic for that.

Moved to next CF for now.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Edmund Horner
Date:
Subject: Re: Tid scan improvements
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronous replay take III