Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id 20190129045158.GD3121@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 05:05:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I thought about that too, but it doesn't seem like an improvement.
> If the query is very long (which isn't unlikely) I think people would
> prefer to see the option(s) up front.

Having these options at the front of the WITH clause looks more
natural to me.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_ssl additions
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb