On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:02:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> You are right, we definitely should. I'll go ahead and fix that. I can't
>> quite make up my mind on if it's a good idea to backpatch that though --
>> it's certainly safe enough to do, but it might cause issues for translators?
>
> Yeah, weak -1 for back-patching. We don't usually like to thrash
> translatable messages in the back branches.
Yes, I think that it is better to not bother about back-branches and
just do that on HEAD.
--
Michael
