On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 07:21:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sorry, I don't buy this line of argument. Reasonable test design requires
> making cost/benefit tradeoffs: the cost to run the test over and over,
> and the cost to maintain the test itself (e.g. fix portability issues in
> it) have to be balanced against the probability of it finding something
> useful. I judge that the chance of this particular test finding something
> is small, and I've had quite enough of the maintenance costs.
Yes, I agree with Tom's line of thoughts here. It seems to me that
just dropping this part of the test is just but fine.
--
Michael
