On 2019-Jan-17, Tom Lane wrote:
> DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL_AUTO, however, broke this completely, as the code
> has no hesitation about making multiple entries of that kind. After
> rather cursorily looking at that code, I'm leaning to the position
> that DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL_AUTO is broken-by-design and needs to be
> nuked from orbit. In the cases where it's being used, such as
> partitioned indexes, I think that probably the right design is one
> DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL dependency on the partition master index, and
> then one DEPENDENCY_AUTO dependency on the matching partitioned table.
As I recall, the problem with that approach is that you can't drop the
partition when a partitioned index exists, because it follows the link
to the parent index and tries to drop that.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
