On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:59:31PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> That's my opinion too, but I was outvoted in another subthread -- see
> https://postgr.es/m/20181214144529.wvmjwmy7wxgmgyb3@alvherre.pgsql
> Stephen Frost, Andrew Gierth and Andres Freund all voted to put
> CONCURRENTLY outside the parens. It seems we now have three votes to
> put it *in* the parens (you, Peter Eisentraut, me). I guess more votes
> are needed to settle this issue.
Sure, let's see. I would have been in the crowd of not using
parenthetised grammar five years ago, but the recent deals with other
commands worry me, as we would repeat the same errors.
> My opinion is that if we had had parenthesized options lists back when
> CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY was invented, we would have put it there.
> But we were young and needed the money ...
:)
--
Michael
