Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id 20190111181934.g5qig23o7rxubnjt@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-01-11 11:12:25 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I actually think that we should go "all in" here and allow the user to
> specify either that they want materialization or that they don't want
> materialization.  If they specify neither, then we make some decision
> which we may change in a future release.  If they do specify
> something, we do that.

+many


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Ryu floating point output patch
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing