Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joerg Sonnenberger
Subject Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables)
Date
Msg-id 20190106145317.GA17679@britannica.bec.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 03:11:55AM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> What I'm most interested in is how long it took to generate the hash
> function in hash2.c?

It's within the noise floor of time(1) on my laptop, e.g. ~1ms.

Joerg

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option
Next
From: Nikolay Shaplov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Add enum releation option type