Re: A few new options for vacuumdb - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: A few new options for vacuumdb
Date
Msg-id 20190105011941.GD4849@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A few new options for vacuumdb  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 11:49:46PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> 0004 introduces a slight change to existing behavior.  Currently, if
> you specify a missing table, vacuumdb will process each table until
> it reaches the nonexistent one, at which point it will fail.  After
> 0004 is applied, vacuumdb will fail during the catalog query, and no
> tables will be processed.

I have not looked at the patch set in details, but that would make
vacuumdb more consistent with the way VACUUM works with multiple
relations, which sounds like a good thing.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: commit fest app: Authors
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Use atexit() in initdb and pg_basebackup