Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> If this is going to end up being one fairly small C file implementing
>> a spec that is not a moving target, I'd vote against depending on an
>> external library instead, no matter how spiffy and license-compatible
>> the external library might be.
> My understanding is that it's possible to include (fork) a MIT or BSD
> source code into our source tree, right? (Some other licenses certainly
> apply too).
MIT or 2-clause BSD would be ok for such a thing, other licenses
probably not.
regards, tom lane
