Re: removal of dangling temp tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: removal of dangling temp tables
Date
Msg-id 20181227225654.GA2196@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: removal of dangling temp tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: removal of dangling temp tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:30:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> We allow structs to receive new members at the end of the struct, since
> this doesn't affect the offset of existing members; thus code already
> compiled with the previous struct definition does not break.  AFAICS
> there is no danger in backpatching that, moving that struct member at
> the end of the struct.

Sure.  Now this comes to PGPROC, which I am not sure we can say is
never manipulated as an array.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: random() (was Re: New GUC to sample log queries)