On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 06:12:12PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> I think so too. I think it might be better to add regression tests for the
> view case as well, though.
Agreed.
>> Would you like to
>> update the patch yourself?
>
> I'd be happy if you worked on that.
Attached is the patch with two new test cases blowing with wal_level =
minimal. On HEAD, I suggest that we use RELKIND_CAN_HAVE_STORAGE to not
fall again in this trap in the future. For back-branches, let's just
add the appropriate relkind checks as suggested upthread. Please note
that the attached patch is for HEAD, and I'll adjust for other branches.
The view part needs to go down to v10, and the part for foreign tables
down to v11.
Thoughts?
--
Michael
