Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Why aren't we using strsignal(3) ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Abhijit Menon-Sen
Subject Re: Why aren't we using strsignal(3) ?
Date
Msg-id 20181217165928.nehzyfo2ufy7hguk@toroid.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why aren't we using strsignal(3) ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
At 2018-12-17 11:52:03 -0500, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
>
> While a dozen lines in pgstrsignal.c certainly are not worth worrying
> over, getting rid of the configure test for sys_siglist[] would save
> some cycles on every build.  So I'm tempted to drop it.  Thoughts?

Removing it makes sense to me.

-- Abhijit

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why aren't we using strsignal(3) ?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Why aren't we using strsignal(3) ?