On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 06:35:03PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> As far as the information content of this comment is concerned, I think
> it'd be more useful to word this comment such that it is applicable to
> different functions than to word it such that it is applicable to
> different queries. More opinions would be nice.
This argument is sensible.
> Okay, how about:
>
> -- Various partitioning-related functions return NULL if passed relations
> -- of types that cannot be part of a partition tree; for example, views,
> -- materialized views, etc.
Okay, this suggestion sounds fine to me. Thanks!
--
Michael
