Re: Fixing typos in tests of partition_info.sql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Fixing typos in tests of partition_info.sql
Date
Msg-id 20181217091008.GG5223@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fixing typos in tests of partition_info.sql  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Fixing typos in tests of partition_info.sql  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:56:08PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> You're saying that we should use plural "functions" because there of 2
> *instances* of calling the function pg_partition_tree in the queries that
> follow the comment, but I think that would be misleading.  I think the
> plural would make sense if we're talking about two different functions,
> but I may be wrong.

Or this could just use "Function calls"?  My argument is just to not
forget about updating this comment later on and minimize future noise
diffs.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove double trailing semicolons
Next
From: "Matsumura, Ryo"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG