Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date
Msg-id 20181216063457.GG5012@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 09:00:58AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Dec-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Do you happen to have a link for that?  I didn't find anything.

The message I was thinking about is close to here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20121210152856.GC16664@awork2.anarazel.de

> I think putting the CONCURRENTLY in the parenthesized list of options is
> most sensible.

For new options of VACUUM and ANALYZE we tend to prefer that as well,
and this simplifies the query parsing.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: select limit error in file_fdw
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY