On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 07:31:02PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tsunakawa, Takayuki (tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com) wrote:
>> From: Christoph Berg [mailto:christoph.berg@credativ.de]
>> > A customer was complaining that the "checkpoint starting: xlog"
>> > message was not included in the grand PG10 rename of user-visible bits.
>> > The attached patch fixes that.
>>
>> Can we make use of this chance to change elog() to ereport(), so that the two messages are translated?
>
> +1, and we should probably look for nearby cases to fix also..
Good point. +1.
--
Michael