Re: Section 26.2.1. Planning wording - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Section 26.2.1. Planning wording
Date
Msg-id 20181127015443.GB16835@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Section 26.2.1. Planning wording  (Theo Kramer <theo@flame.co.za>)
List pgsql-docs
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:38:02AM +0200, Theo Kramer wrote:
> Section 26.2.1. Planning wording includes the following
> 
> "In any case the hardware architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not
work."
> 
> would  be more correct if it read as follows
> 
> "In any case the CPU architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
> 
> as “hardware architecture” would imply the difference between say Dell and IBM which should be ok if the CPU is the
samearchitecture ...
 

I feel we might have cases where differences beyond the CPU might
matter, though I can't think of any now.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: missing windows info
Next
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: Return codes for archive and restore commands