At 2018-11-26 10:18:52 -0500, sfrost@snowman.net wrote:
>
> > This came originally to check that recovery.conf handles correctly
> > its recovery targets when multiple ones are defined with the last
> > one winning […]
>
> Ugh, no, I don't agree that this property makes sense to keep and
> since we're making these changes, I'd argue that it's exactly the
> right time to do away with that.
I strongly agree with everything Stephen said here.
-- Abhijit
