On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:00:39PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> It seems to me that EquivalenceClass, the struct/type name, has been
> misspelled as 'EquivalenceClasses' a couple of times in the comment above
> its definition.
EquivalenceClasses stands for the plural of EquivalenceClass. So
thinking like that...
> - * EquivalenceClasses
> + * EquivalenceClass
... This is fine.
> - * We also use EquivalenceClasses as the base structure for PathKeys, letting
> + * We also use EquivalenceClass as the base structure for PathKeys, letting
... But not that.
--
Michael
