Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE
Date
Msg-id 20181106051551.GG1814@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:29:36PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Thanks.  Pushed to master only.

Just a wild idea while this thread is hot: could we add in the
description of the broken APIs or in their headers more information
about how to not use them so as users are warned if trying to use them
in certain circumstances?  This idea is just for the stable branches.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_promote not marked as parallel-restricted in pg_proc.dat
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE