Re: Unused entry in pg_opfamily - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Unused entry in pg_opfamily
Date
Msg-id 20181105011235.GB1718@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Unused entry in pg_opfamily  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 08:02:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> We should, therefore, at least add an oprsanity check for
> opfamilies without opclasses.  I wonder how far it's worth
> going to check for other orphaned catalog entries.

+1.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Unused entry in pg_opfamily
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT